Skip to main content
Chronicle

Chronicle Research / 2026

TheTransparency Gapin Onchain Finance

A $12.3 Billion Blindspot in Tokenized Asset Infrastructure

The tokenized asset market has inherited a patchwork of disclosure practices established at the discretion of individual issuers. The result is a market growing faster than the infrastructure required to underwrite it. This report defines, explores, and measures that gap by evaluating 20 of the largest tokenized assets against five measurable dimensions of transparency.

Sample value
$17.31B
Assets sampled
20
Of tokenized asset market
53.4%
Transparency dimensions
5

01 / The problem

Tokenized assets are outpacing infrastructure adoption

The tokenized asset market is growing faster than the infrastructure required to underwrite it. Disclosure remains fragmented, with frequency, quality, and depth largely at the discretion of individual issuers.

Anyone can see token supply, ownership by address, and transfer activity in real time. But true onchain financial utility requires sufficient risk evaluation. Precise, accurate, and readily available data about the underlying real-world holdings of tokenized assets is paramount.

02 / The framework

Five dimensions of tokenized asset transparency

The spectrum spans from limited information self-reported by an asset issuer to independently reported and verified data published onchain, with third-party attestations, audits, and reserve reports in between. The report evaluates assets across five dimensions: independence, granularity, frequency, verifiability, and onchain availability.

  1. 01

    Independence

    Whether an independent third party is responsible for reporting the data, or whether the asset issuer or tokenization platform reports it directly.

  2. 02

    Granularity

    Whether the method surfaces high-level, aggregate reserve value(s) or a single net asset value (NAV) versus individual, asset-level holdings.

  3. 03

    Frequency

    The reporting cadence of a given method, from daily to annual.

  4. 04

    Verifiability

    Whether data can be independently verified to be valid and tamper-free, or if an external party must be trusted.

  5. 05

    Onchain availability

    Whether data exists onchain for DeFi protocols and smart contracts to reference.

03 / The finding

Only 29.2% of sampled tokenized asset value currently meets a sufficient transparency standard.

100% of sampled assets feature some form of transparency, but that share decreases substantially with each additional dimension layered on.

Verifiable
29.2%

of sampled value clears all five dimensions.

Unproven
70.8%

$12.3B in value relies on trust in its holdings rather than proof of them.

04 / Perspectives

Perspectives on the transparency gap

Name Surname
Title, Company
Insert approved quote here.
Name Surname
Title, Company
Insert approved quote here.
Name Surname
Title, Company
Insert approved quote here.

Download the full report

The gap is measurable. So is the fix. Download the report to see all 20 assets scored across five dimensions, plus the full methodology.

We'll email you the report.

You can unsubscribe at any time. See our privacy policy for how we handle your details, including how to ask us to delete them.

05 / FAQ

FAQ

About the sample, methodology, and five dimensions of transparency.

The report evaluates 20 of the largest tokenized assets against five measurable dimensions of transparency. The sample includes tokenized treasuries and onchain credit and represents 53.4% of the tokenized asset market's total value: $17.31 billion out of $32.43 billion, with all data as of June 30, 2026.